Comments on: Cone controversy

By: DLKeur

DLKeur — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:33:59 +0000

So would anyone have a problem if it instead sort of kinda looked like the word “Jesus” or if it looked like any Christian religious icon?

By: dumpendebat

dumpendebat — Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:56:01 +0000

Unécoeuré: Vous êtes complètement fou.

By: unécoeuré

unécoeuré — Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:55:41 +0000

Litlle by little Islam is swalling the judeo/christian
civilisation. World is slepping, Islam is fuking and get more and more people where once then will come asking
of what they want to own, and then it will be too late.
Is is not too late actually ??

By: Jason

Jason — Tue, 25 Oct 2005 03:35:43 +0000

Well, having studied Arabic for the past year and a half, and having memorized the fatha in Arabic, and being a new student of Islamic fundamentalism (from a SCHOLARLY perspective, not an ideological one), I would like to say this:

The resemblance is uncanny.

And, although I see the shape of the soft-serve ice cream pile (or doggy doo pile) in that brown image, the only reason it looks more like ice cream than the image of Allah in Arabic is that it’s on an ice cream cone. If it were on the Quran, nobody would be saying “hey, that looks like a pile of soft serve ice cream!”

By the way, if you ever hear anyone scream “Allah akbar!”, dive for cover.

By: dumpendebat

dumpendebat — Sat, 08 Oct 2005 18:17:53 +0000

Huh?

I’m “fucking nuts,” even though “there is an uncanny resemblance”?

How do you figure, cowboy?

What is a “frond” and how is it “bend [sic] in an alternate direction”?

I’m impressed with your knowledge of the “fact the basic shape of a letter is important.” Is that what you’d call an “uncanny resemblance,” maybe?

What is “the but of the letter” and how might it be, or not be, “reflected”?

Guess what I think? I think you don’t have the slightest idea what the fuck you’re talking about. Thanks for dropping by, though.

By: Mythos

Mythos — Sat, 08 Oct 2005 16:08:30 +0000

What are you? Fucking nuts! While there is an uncanny resemblance it only comes in the general dessending shape. If you look closely the fronds are bend in an alternate direction and I know for a fact the basic shape of a letter is important, not to mention the but of the letter isn’t reflected. This doesn’t even classify on the same level as Engrish!

By: dumpendebat

dumpendebat — Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:50:14 +0000

If you're interested in the etymology of "dhimmitude," see this earlier post from the archives.

By: The Liberal Avenger

The Liberal Avenger — Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:59:36 +0000

Finally some real answers!

Dhimmitude, indeed.