Comments on: The Right’s vilification of imaginary strawmen

By: Stram

Stram — Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:56:53 +0000

Save yourself some agony and try to ignore it.

By: dumpendebat

dumpendebat — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:33:16 +0000

Wow, it looks like a lot happened while I was gone. I’ve got a lot of fighting to get caught up on here.

By: Stram

Stram — Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:04:37 +0000

‘Traitor, treason, cowards’.

When you and are in a discussion, there’s one veteran between us-and it ain’t you, chickenhawk.

By: Hank Dagny

Hank Dagny — Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:22:26 +0000

Stram, trust me – I am protecting you.
You are all upset because I call you liberals traitors, cowards, metally ill or weak – and your leaders power-hungry megalomaniacs, using your limitations for their conquests.
I give you this and it will hit you harder than any fist.
“The sting in any rebuke is in the truth.” – Benjamin Franklin
Me thinks thee protests too much.

By: Stram

Stram — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:55:40 +0000

I see you ‘have no comeback’ on your embarrassment of being made to look like a lying fool on ‘unemployment being 1.5% lower now than under Clinton’ statement, which is where this began.

As for Treasury revenue, it took Bush 4 years to get revenue back to where it was in Clinton’s last year in office. That’s hardly something to brag about.

As for ‘cowards’? We already proved this weekend who the ‘coward’ is among us, now didn’t we?

By: Hank Dagny

Hank Dagny — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:43:28 +0000

Hey Stram, go write an unbinding resolution for surrender.
Bin Laden was right that Americans would not have the guts to defend themselves. Stram and the rest of the Democrats are the perfect liberal example of cowards and treasonous surrenderers.
Stram, I see you had no comeback for the record amount of money pouring into the treasury due to TAX CUTS.
Liberals are not only cowards, but are delusional as well.

By: Stram

Stram — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:56:59 +0000

Mr. Filius, first of all, I apologize for going off topic here, but Dank is a persistent idiot that has a terrible time with simple math. If you remember I sent the link from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that showed the unemployment rate was 4% when Clinton left office and as of January 2007, it was 4.6%. Not to mention that unemployment surged to 6% in 2003.

Could you explain to the simple-minded moron who makes up his own facts, which number, 4.6 or 4.0 is higher?

Thank you.

http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm

By: Hank Dagny

Hank Dagny — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:48:34 +0000

Fourputt may delete it, but I won’t. A liberal decomposing is worth watching. Go pass an unbinding resolution to stop global warming and world hunger.
The unemployment numbers were better under Bush 43 than Clinton. The economy was better under Bush 43 than Clinton. And the US Treasury collected more money under Bush 43 than Clinton – because of tax cuts.
You are a liberal fool – which is redundant Stram.

By: Stram

Stram — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:22:25 +0000

Mr. Filius,

Go over to LQ (Liar’s Quorum) and read my comment written under ‘notsoanonymous’, in the top blog story.

Hurry, they will soon be deleting it.

By: Stram

Stram — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:28:30 +0000

Hank, you’re the moron. It’s Democrats who support the troops and it’s Republicans who cut veterans benefits when they’re most needed.

But lying, made-up rhetoric is what you’re known for.

Now that you’ve stuck your head out from behind your wife’s skirt, why don’t you answer the challenge from here a couple of weeks ago that you ran and hid from?

Answer the challenge to your made up bullshit that ‘unemployment is full 1.5% lower now than under Clinton’. Also, you never admitted that you’re the moron who said those Starkist workers ‘were from Pelosi’s own district’.

Don’t run away like some punk-ass coward and think people are going to just forget the nonsense you write. If you’re not man enough to answer to what you write then just admit you’re a punk and a lying fool.